Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+W6SAI\s+three\s+wire\s+inverted\s+L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+W6SAI\s+three\s+wire\s+inverted\s+L\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: W6SAI three wire inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Tony" <g3zrj@morsekey.fsnet.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:28:00 +0100; Hi, I am about to erect an antenna for Top Band, I've found an article on the Web from an old issue of Ham Radio magazine, where W6SAI described the evolution of a 3 wire inverted L for use in a smal; /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00124.html (8,050 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: W6SAI three wire inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:37:45 -0400; I am about to erect an antenna for Top Band, I've found an article on the Web from an old issue of Ham Radio magazine, where W6SAI described the evolution of a 3 wire inverted L for use in a small ga; /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00127.html (9,690 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: W6SAI three wire inverted L (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:36:54 EDT; Antenna "efficiency" and loading efficiencies aside I wonder if there are real, significant advantages in having the current node up top on a vertical antenna (like that KE4UYP linear loaded model) o; /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00128.html (7,211 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: W6SAI three wire inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:12:35 -0700; Peter This is my anecdotal info for you. Earlier this year I completed QRP WAS on 160m using a 50 ft top loaded vertical. When I built it, I arranged the length and loading to put the current max in; /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00135.html (7,686 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]