- 1. Topband: Vertical on tophill loc. ? (score: 1)
- Author: danilo.brelih@siol.net (Dan, S50U)
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 23:12:33 +0100
- Greetings all We are considering adding a second 160m antenna to an existing delta loop at S54E station. The loop is fed for max. vertical polarization, but it is tilted because we didn't have a supp
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00029.html (8,785 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Vertical on tophill loc. ? (score: 1)
- Author: kaufmann@ll.mit.edu (John Kaufmann)
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 17:31:25 -0500
- In general, terrain which slopes downhill enhances radiation at very low angles. This is true for both horizontal and vertical antennas. The details depend on the antenna and the features of the terr
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00031.html (7,798 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Vertical on tophill loc. ? (score: 1)
- Author: kk@cg.yu (V.Kecman, Kele YU1AO/6)
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 11:29:30 +0100
- Apart from K6STI's TA1.0 software, the phenomenum of hilltop locations is explained in the book: Physical Design of Yagi Antennas, by W6NL (ex W6QHS). improve low angle takeoff from any antenna, even
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00036.html (8,019 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Vertical on tophill loc. ? (score: 1)
- Author: donhall@myriad.net (Don Hall)
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:50:54 -0600
- I was told by some of the Southeast Asia Oldtimers that a horizontal on a hill was a real DX grabbing antenn. So at 9V1SH I had a 80/40 meter dipole on my three story house which was on one of the hi
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00039.html (7,447 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Vertical on tophill loc. ? (score: 1)
- Author: wally@el-soft.com (Valeri Stefanov)
- Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2000 13:05:27 +0200
- What about a comparisson between the vertical and dipole on high rocky mountain terrain Tom ? Any comments on that ? Otherwise I agree with you. At LZ9A we have an Inv.Vee up 27m at its apex with end
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00051.html (7,591 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu