Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Vertical\s+antennas\s+aren\'t\s+always\s+best\s+for\s+DX\s+everywhere\s+\-\s+the\s+facts\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:49:00 +0800
Hi JC In my experience, here in the southern hemisphere and relatively close to the equator, I wish that "Vertical TX antenna is the only way to work DX on topband!" Unfortunately vertical antennas m
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00220.html (14,663 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:40:10 -0800
Holy YMMV. Thanks for your great posting of what most of us didn't know (I know I didn't). Do you have any numerical data concerning the ground conductivity in VK6 vs the VK east coast? The conductiv
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00223.html (15,969 bytes)

3. Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: F Z_Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 11:28:04 -0500
Its difficult to use Geomagnetic latitude as a basis of conductivity because of variables. Robin VK6LK lived in Margaret River, Western Australia, and salt sea water was a few feet under ground. He u
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00224.html (15,930 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 11:56:23 -0500 (EST)
Hi Rick and Steve, Steve's QTH is almost directly north of the south geomagnetic pole. His latitude is approximately 32 degrees south geographic latitude and approximately 43 degrees south geomagneti
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00225.html (17,770 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:03:30 -0500
What Steve and Nick VE7DXR were referring to is the geomagnetic latitude in relation to polarization - not ground conductivity. This involves the ordinary and extraordinary waves that propagate throu
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00226.html (8,027 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: <n4is@n4is.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:39:24 -0500
Hi Frank I can comment on horizontal polarization. I am experiencing both polarization since 1980; with a vertical and a inverted V at 30m and 40m later; also with high DRF receiving antennas like th
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00229.html (12,043 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 19:08:40 +0800
Hi Frank (and Rick) Somewhere I have a map of the lines of geomagnetic latitude superimposed on a Mercator projection of the world, but I cant find it right now. Unlike the ruler-straight lines of co
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00243.html (24,645 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:25:07 -0600
Here is an interesting pdf document including information on the effects of Earth's Electron Gyrofrequency on 160 meters. The 160-Meter Band: An Enigma Shrouded in Mystery http://solar.spacew.com/cq/
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00247.html (14,393 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:56:17 +0800
Hi Frank (and Rick) Somewhere I have a map of the lines of geomagnetic latitude superimposed on a Mercator projection of the world, but I cant find it right now. Unlike the ruler-straight lines of co
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00255.html (14,397 bytes)

10. Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: F Z_Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:40:44 -0500
Hi Steve, Low band Dxers,, Some of the trials involving 5/8 wave verticals on the broadcast band, and 160 meters preformed poorly. Optimum take off angle is quite a bit higher. 73 Bruce-k1fz Hi Frank
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00264.html (15,244 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:19:58 -0600
This has been an eye-opening discussion for me! I have always preached the 'gospel' of vertical-is-usually-best based on W8JI, ON4UN, and *many* other long-time Topbanders. Someday I'll have to revis
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00267.html (15,326 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:30:10 -0600
It just dawned on me that the reason why an inverted-L works so well for many is because it radiates both vertically and horizontally. Remember W8JI's experience where a nearby ham, using an inverted
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00268.html (16,611 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:35:17 -0500
Have to remember that W8JI, ON4UN and many others were not lying or deceived. What we are finding out is that a major rule has some exceptions. If you're talking to a club member in the US, you bette
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00269.html (17,295 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts (score: 1)
Author: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:06:28 -0500
There is no such things as "best antenna". When I lived in Arizona, I had on a hill-top a doublet with 300 foot arms at 100 foot height (effectively more because of the hill-top). I used it both as a
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00281.html (16,985 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu