Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Vertical\s+Dipoles\s+on\s+160\s+Meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Vertical\s+Dipoles\s+on\s+160\s+Meters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Vertical Dipoles on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: John Crovelli <w2gd@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 17:31:21 +0000; For those who have limited space and are unable to lay out an effective ground system, the vertical dipole offers a very worthwhile alternative to an Inverted-L or low Inverted-V. It is relatively ea; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00018.html (6,843 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Vertical Dipoles on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 12:14:05 -0700; Yes, and so is the end-loading technique shown in the K2KQ design. N6BT has used it extensively in his designs, and W6GJB and I have used it for portable designs for county expeditions and Field Day.; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00019.html (8,311 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Vertical Dipoles on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 13:54:10 -0700; I think of this as essentially an inverted-L with one elevated radial ... driven at the second harmonic. It seems to me it would work work better with 2 or 4 radials, and with 2 or 4 top loading wire; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00020.html (7,611 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Vertical Dipoles on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: charlie carroll <k1xx@k1xx.com>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 18:01:35 -0400; We use the K2KQ inspired vertical dipole at PJ4K for 160. Top's at about 135 feet and bottom at 30 feet. We opted for this approach so that there's no fighting the cactus to install ground-mounted; /archives//html/Topband/2021-05/msg00021.html (8,198 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]