Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Tuned\s+Radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Tuned\s+Radials\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Tuned Radials (score: 1): Author: N0KHQ@aol.com; Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 07:52:41 EDT; Good Morning. The solution I use here to tune radials is to insert an RF Counterpoise Tuner (TT-1251) between the coax shield and radial system at the antenna feed point. With low power on the antenn; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00050.html (6,556 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Tuned Radials (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:01:11 -0400; Counterpoise Tuner antenna feed Counterpoise Tuner for maximum Won't do a thing for loss. The loss in the radials is fixed by the current and electrical field density around the radial regardless of; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00052.html (8,799 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Tuned Radials (score: 1): Author: K9SQG@aol.com; Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:00:38 EDT; It seems to me that any attempt to tune ground radials would be quite an undertaking if one wanted them to be resonent for the entire 160 m band. I'm having enough difficulty just getting my inverted; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00053.html (6,696 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Tuned Radials (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:26:09 EDT; Re the questionable (or inaccurate) claim recited about using low VF coax to shorten radials in some of W6SAI's books - Orr doesn't actually state that as fact but rather reports it as what other's h; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00056.html (7,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]