Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Triple\s+slopers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Triple\s+slopers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Triple slopers (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:17:19 -0500; Related topic...from K0RF on the 3830 reflector: triple slopers fed at the top of 4 of my towers at 120 feet. It has a good pattern and hears pretty well. No radials. Can't put them here. I felt loud; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00101.html (7,273 bytes)
2. RE: Topband: Triple slopers (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:37:35 -0500; Bill, I wonder if the triple sloper systems aren't acting as a very sparse discone? If so, improvements could be made by adding additional sloping (skirt) wires and detuning the tower below the attac; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00105.html (8,046 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Triple slopers (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:24:59 -0800; Congrats John. I would like to point out that this score has not been obtained just by having the biggest signal on the band and calling CQ all night. First off, K5NA was much louder up here during; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00106.html (7,461 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Triple slopers (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:38:47 -0800; If doing this - make sure to notice the error in the ON4UN book that says to adjust the current in the detuning loop to minimum. The correct procedure is maximum in the detuning loop. Or, another wa; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00108.html (7,621 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]