- 1. Re: Topband: Tree losses.... (score: 1)
- Author: "D. S. Coleman" <cwforever2@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:35:16 -0400
- Gentlemen: I wanted to weigh-in on the discussion of the impact of tree losses on transmitting antenna performance. Of course I have no quantitative data, but experience is suggestive of potentially
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00084.html (8,757 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Tree losses.... (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:04:32 -0600
- The only way to say which location is better is to do a side by side comparison which didn't happen. You are making assumptions which may be wrong or may be right. Blaming it on trees is a guess. The
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00087.html (6,788 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Tree losses.... (score: 1)
- Author: "D. S. Coleman" <cwforever2@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 22:32:51 -0400
- Hi Doug , Like so many things related to antenna installations, side by side comparisons are usually impossible. Without the ability to do meaningful measurements, it is also unlikely that one can ca
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00089.html (9,091 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Tree losses.... (score: 1)
- Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
- I just did a small and inelegant piece of modelling with EZNEC. I took a wire 128' vertical, and it showed a gain of about 1.7dBi over a particular ground. Keeping everything else the same, I introdu
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00097.html (8,773 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Tree losses.... (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Kupps <n6bk@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 05:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Very nice study and IMO neither small nor inelegant. Thanks I just did a small and inelegant piece of modelling with EZNEC. I took a wire 128' vertical, and it showed a gain of about 1.7dBi over a pa
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00099.html (9,272 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu