Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+136\,\s+Issue\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+136\,\s+Issue\s+1\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 136, Issue 1 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Olean" <k1whs@metrocast.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 22:41:01 -0400; Hello Mike I have found that JT65 provides a bit better than 10 dB more than a good cw weak signal (read that as a real weak cw ) contact. I can copy signals by ear that are listed as about -18 dB or; /archives//html/Topband/2014-04/msg00002.html (8,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]