Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+Antennas\/FCP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+Antennas\/FCP\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Topband Antennas/FCP (score: 1): Author: Charlie Young <weeksmgr@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 07:47:23 -0500; It is great to see the technical discussion regarding topband antennas, particularly the FCP. Thanks to K2AV for putting his ideas and design out there for peer review. Hopefully the review process w; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00003.html (9,171 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Topband Antennas/FCP (score: 1): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:37:37 -0700 (PDT); With all due respect: The FCP is a dipole. One end is vertical while the other is weaved horizontal on or near the ground. The 1:1 isolation Trasformer / Balun serves its purpose as well as stopping; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00009.html (7,539 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Topband Antennas/FCP (score: 1): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:19:14 -0700 (PDT); The FPC Isolation Trasformer / Balun I am suspecting has a loss about 2 DB a little more loss than a non isolated balun. Has any one ran any data on this? Stay on course, fight a good fight, and kee; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00015.html (6,816 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Topband Antennas/FCP (score: 1): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:32:25 -0700 (PDT); 1.4 db loss, the fact that it heats up still tells me the coupling is not right. It should not heat up at all. Seams that the coupling is a bit too tight. Hi Q. I messed with this but with a differen; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00035.html (7,595 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]