Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Thanks\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Thanks\!\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: THANKS! (score: 1): Author: watchman@tig.com.au (VK2ICV); Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 22:16:56 +1000; Dear friends, Thanks to all of you who have responded to my previous request for help regarding "Who's Who..." What a great bunch of people you are! Once again it has been proven that this is gentlem; /archives//html/Topband/1999-04/msg00045.html (7,139 bytes)
2. TopBand: THANKS! (score: 1): Author: k8sm@juno.com (SCOTT A LONG); Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:41:52 EDT; THANKS to everyone that responded to my need for installing this antenna! This truely is the gentleman's band/reflector. I received alot of great ideas, some which I never thought of. I went out to o; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00160.html (7,032 bytes)
3. Topband: THANKS! (score: 1): Author: "Osten B Magnusson" <sm5dqc@areteadsl.se>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 11:17:49 +0200; Dear friends! The response to my question regarding coaxial loops was much more than expected, so I don't have the time to thank you in personal e-mails, doing it this way instead. THANKS to all of y; /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00008.html (6,691 bytes)
4. Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: dospicos@q.com; Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 09:37:42 -0400 (EDT); Hi Folks; Thanks a bunch, to all those who responded with source possibilities for 31 mix toroids ! I will add a note here, after I actually make a purchase to designate the lucky victim of my s; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00111.html (6,390 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 12:17:18 -0400; Good luck, Dean!! I'm sure you can find what you need! (I've even thought about approaching Kreger Components about establishing a small dealership to serve the amateur community) I think that Jim's; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00113.html (7,912 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 13:35:23 -0400; Hi, Dean Well good luck in your hunt. Over the years I've found many uses for various Fair-Rite cores at HF. If you get the larger beads/tubes thatwill fit over RG-213 etc. you can make excellent 1:1; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00115.html (9,479 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:58:58 -0700; These are not "excellent" 1:1 current baluns below about 75 MHz. Below that range, they are a lousy common mode choke, because they are inductive. Inductive chokes resonate with a line that is capaci; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00118.html (8,593 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:42:01 -0400; These are not "excellent" 1:1 current baluns below about 75 MHz. Below that range, they are a lousy common mode choke, because they are inductive. Inductive chokes resonate with a line that is capaci; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00124.html (10,434 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:55:17 -0400; Well, I haven't used 31 mix material for common-mode chokes or current baluns, because I didn't have any - but it would be my choice. I used higher frequency material because I had plenty of it - som; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00133.html (10,676 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:07:49 -0400; Well, I haven't used 31 mix material for common-mode chokes or current baluns, because I didn't have any - but it would be my choice. I used higher frequency material because I had plenty of it - som; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00135.html (9,675 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:19:41 -0400; Well, I've wondered about the heating of 31 material because of the large resistive term. I've used higher frequency material (71 as I recall) because I had lots of it in all shapes and sizes in Desi; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00136.html (10,125 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:40:53 -0400; Well, Tom I think that 31 material is probably a good choice for cleaning RF from wiring that isn't handling RF power and where there isn't much in the way of shunt impedance for the choke to work ag; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00137.html (9,954 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:01:03 -0500; That's true, but 31 material is the closest thing I've come to a "magic cure" here, for several applications in the past year! :-) It's the ONLY material that kept 75 meter RF from getting into my sh; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00138.html (8,367 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 01:35:11 -0500; Hi Charlie, You are right, and you can thank Jim, K9YC for that. I used 14 turns of CAT5 on a 2.4" OD #31 ferrite core, per his suggestion. Photo attached. Out of all the info I have ever read on fer; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00139.html (10,020 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:35:06 -0400; I think that 31 material is probably a good choice for cleaning RF from wiring that isn't handling RF power and where there isn't much in the way of shunt impedance for the choke to work against -lik; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00141.html (12,543 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 10:12:48 -0400; All good and valid points, Tom! Thanks! Regards, Charlie, K4OTV That line has shunt impedances. Almost everything does. A main area for shunting impedance is the entrance ground. The individual wires; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00142.html (12,299 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 07:41:58 -0700; I have published extensively on this, first in 2005 in a peer reviewed AES paper, and later in my RFI tutorial. All of this work is on my website. W1HIS published his work on this in 2006. A few year; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00144.html (9,943 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:18:36 -0400; Are you now claiming that the thousands of bead choke baluns in use for decades at HF and 6M dont work? I suspect that those who have been happy with the results in mimizing feedline radiation would; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00152.html (10,406 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: Thanks! (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:31:27 -0400; I have published extensively on this, first in 2005 in a peer reviewed AES paper, and later in my RFI tutorial. All of this work is on my website. W1HIS published his work on this in 2006. A few year; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00155.html (13,037 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]