Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Tee\s+Verticals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Tee\s+Verticals\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Tee Verticals (score: 1): Author: "Bill Gaines AD8P" <ad8p@wcoil.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:25:30 -0400; For several years now I have used a 65' tall "Tee" vertical on 160. It is an open wire fed 80 meter dipole with the feed point shorted and fed together. This is fed against 6 or 7 elevated 1/4 wave r; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00128.html (7,597 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Tee Verticals (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:42:48 -0700; radials. Several thoughts. What I'm using is quite close to yours -- an 80/40 dipole fed with about 70 ft of 72 ohm kW twinlead (long out of production) against 25 radials that are 70 ft long. I thin; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00132.html (8,573 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Tee Verticals (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:27:50 -0500; Amen. Last fall I decided to rework my radial system. Here on this small city lot it's difficult, and nice long, straight, 1/4 wl radials are out of the question. I put down 16 thirty foot radials.; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00135.html (8,372 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Tee Verticals (score: 1): Author: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:50:39 +0000; I say that they are so closely coupled that you might just as well short the top and bottom of the oper wire line, and feed the whole thing as a vertical tee on both 80 and 160. I run open wire feed; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00138.html (9,751 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]