Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Takeoff\s+Angle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Takeoff\s+Angle\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Takeoff Angle (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com (KN4LF, T. F. Giella); Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 22:01:58 +0100; Thomas KN4LF Says: I would not expect to see close in one way propagation on 160 as mentioned above but takeoff angle is very important for close in ragchewing versus DXing. Here in Florida a group m; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00006.html (7,828 bytes)
2. Topband: Takeoff Angle (score: 1): Author: k4kyv@hotmail.com (Donald Chester); Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:09:15 +0000; There is a skip zone on 160 just as 80 just My 80 metre dipole, fed with open wire line as a quarter-wave dipole on 160, puts about 30 dB more signal into Nashville (approx. 50 miles away) than does; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00014.html (6,754 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]