Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TCX\s+over\s+salt\s+water\s+\.\.160\s+x\s+80m\s+KH1\/KH7Z\s+Top\s+Band\s+Ops\s+Brief\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TCX\s+over\s+salt\s+water\s+\.\.160\s+x\s+80m\s+KH1\/KH7Z\s+Top\s+Band\s+Ops\s+Brief\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: TCX over salt water ..160 x 80m KH1/KH7Z Top Band Ops Brief (score: 1): Author: <n4is@n4is.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:00:59 -0400; Here in Florida the KH1 signal on 160m was much better than 80m. Almost everyday it started s3 after an hour it was s6 to s7 and some days peaking s9 near sunrise. At the same time on 80m, the signal; /archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00087.html (8,243 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: TCX over salt water ..160 x 80m KH1/KH7Z Top Band Ops Brief (score: 1): Author: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 20:16:07 -0400; JC, Tim, The 80 m antenna was not only not over the salt water, it was far more shielded to the NE by the berm at the top of the beach. Maybe that is why it produced weaker signal in NA. 73, George A; /archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00100.html (9,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]