Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Symbol\s+Rates\s+$was\s+\[ARRL\-LOTW\]\s+BoD\s+votes\s+LoTW\s+initiatives$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Symbol\s+Rates\s+$was\s+\[ARRL\-LOTW\]\s+BoD\s+votes\s+LoTW\s+initiatives$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Symbol Rates (was [ARRL-LOTW] BoD votes LoTW initiatives) (score: 1): Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:09:00 -0400; Joe, I don't understand your objection to removal of the symbol rate language. Under the existing band plan, CW is expected to co-exist with other "digital" modes of all kinds. Now, I don't like to h; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00051.html (8,872 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Symbol Rates (was [ARRL-LOTW] BoD votes LoTW initiatives) (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:42:34 -0400; I don't understand your objection to removal of the symbol rate language. Under the existing band plan, CW is expected to co-exist with other "digital" modes of all kinds. Now, I don't like to hear e; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00052.html (9,355 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]