Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Subject\:\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+the\s+DX\s+doesn\'t\s+always\s+work\s+split\?\s+Especially\s+on\s+the\s+low\s+bands\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Subject\:\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+the\s+DX\s+doesn\'t\s+always\s+work\s+split\?\s+Especially\s+on\s+the\s+low\s+bands\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Subject: Re: Why the DX doesn't always work split? Especially on the low bands (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:18:59 +0800; G'day all and a very merry Christmas It has been interesting reading the comments about DX stations on 160m generally not working split. I thought having the perspective from someone who is generally; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00564.html (7,994 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Subject: Re: Why the DX doesn't always work split? Especially on the low bands (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:43:03 -0500; On 12/22/2012 08:18 PM, Steve Ireland wrote: On the 16 December, there was a nice opening into the eastern USA with signals to S6, but the static and general atmospheric noise was about the same leve; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00566.html (9,147 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]