Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Sub\-band\s+for\s+split\s+operation\s+mirroring\s+the\s+DX\s+window\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Sub\-band\s+for\s+split\s+operation\s+mirroring\s+the\s+DX\s+window\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Sub-band for split operation mirroring the DX window? (score: 1): Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist); Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:34:11 -0800; Just thinking out loud here, I wonder if it would make sense to have DX stations operate from 1830 to 1840 or whatever and listen exactly 100 kHz above their transmitting frequency (ie 1930 to 1940).; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00229.html (7,739 bytes)
2. Topband: Sub-band for split operation mirroring the DX window? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:04:32 -0500; We often tend to focus on this as a contest problem or ragchewer problem, and it is not. It is a rule problem and so it is also a day to day problem. For example, last night just in casual tuning I; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00235.html (8,267 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]