Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+SteppIR\s+for\s+Tophat\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+SteppIR\s+for\s+Tophat\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: SteppIR for Tophat? (score: 1): Author: Martin <dl1iaq@gdxf.de>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:26:56 +0200; Hello topbanders , would a 3 or 4 element SteppIR yagi make a good tophat for a shuntfed tower? What do you think? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Martin mailto:dl1iaq@gdxf.de ______________________; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00045.html (6,387 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: SteppIR for Tophat? (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:47:56 -0400; The problem with a SteppIR would be that the tower tuning changes with the band and frequency the SteppIR is set to. At the very least the SteppIR would need to always be set for a certain frequency; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00046.html (8,313 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: SteppIR for Tophat? (score: 1): Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:47:00 -0700; "would a 3 or 4 element SteppIR yagi make a good tophat for a shuntfed tower?" == I've been wondering the same thing myself. It depends on if the centers of the parasitic elements are grounded to the; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00047.html (7,106 bytes)
4. RE: Topband: SteppIR for Tophat? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:13:57 -0400; grounded ... other than the driven element which is connected the balun/unun and the coax shield. You might ask them how to ground the parasitic elements since they do use the same housing, etc. for; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00048.html (7,636 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]