Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Splitting\s+RX\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Splitting\s+RX\s+antenna\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Splitting RX antenna (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:41:14 -0500; A really neophyte question - can I use a tee, or would a simple switch be better to distribute 160m signal from my RX array to two receivers. The 3 dB from splitting aside, are there other considerat; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00410.html (7,013 bytes)
2. Topband: Splitting RX antenna (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:41:02 -0500; N4ZR: considerations I am missing. Impedance matching. Might or might not be a problem depending on the true input impedance of your receivers. The Magic-T is designed for exactly this purpose and is; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00412.html (6,593 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Splitting RX antenna (score: 1): Author: "Brad Rehm" <brehm@ptitest.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:48:57 -0600; "...can I use a tee, or would a simple switch be better to distribute 160m signal from my RX array to two receivers." "73, Pete N4ZR" Pete, another great option here is the W8ZR multicontroller. It h; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00416.html (7,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]