Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Spitfire\.\.\.\.\.\.\.one\s+more\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Spitfire\.\.\.\.\.\.\.one\s+more\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Spitfire.......one more question (score: 1): Author: Eduardo Araujo <er_araujo@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 14:34:29 -0800 (PST); Hi Topbanders, I am preparing my next move with the spitfire. I have one more question (for those with modeling tools?). In order to detune the elements to allow omnidirectional radiation from the ve; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00257.html (8,156 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Spitfire.......one more question (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 18:54:20 -0500; <<<<In order to detune the elements to allow omnidirectional radiation from the vertical, authors suggested to ground the elements where they are switched from director to reflector which will give y; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00260.html (8,258 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Spitfire.......one more question (score: 1): Author: Eduardo Araujo <er_araujo@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:47:11 -0800 (PST); Many thanks Tom....excellent........as usual. Unfortunately it is impossible to avoid the question..... Good F/B is what I have with little gain which could coincide with your modeling. Which could b; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00262.html (8,710 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Spitfire.......one more question (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:03:08 -0800; And one more question - ON4UN in V5 states that the Spitfire will lose a few db of gain due to ground losses. How does one calculate near field ground losses? What software is needed? A related quest; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00263.html (9,246 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]