Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Spam\:\s+Re\:\s+Low\s+Dipole\s+for\s+RX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Spam\:\s+Re\:\s+Low\s+Dipole\s+for\s+RX\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Spam: Re: Low Dipole for RX (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L" <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:33:29 -0700; (he it I had one here for a few years and it, too, was a waste of time and energy. I never once used it to work a station I could not hear better on another antenna. However, others have reported di; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00021.html (8,332 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]