Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Spam\:\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\,\s+160M\s+Rhombics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Spam\:\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\,\s+160M\s+Rhombics\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Spam:*******, 160M Rhombics (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:56:07 -0400; Tim, A Rhombic for 160 meters would need to be at least 250 feet high on all four support structures to avoid it being a big cloud warmer. Plus having 2 wavelengths on each leg makes this taking up a; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00070.html (8,462 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Spam:*******, 160M Rhombics (score: 1): Author: "Lennart M" <lennart.michaelsson@telia.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:09:23 +0200; Hi Herb and all, That is true - if you are not going for a vertically polarized Rhombic where "only" the center support structures need to be tall. However that calls for a very good ground system, n; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00071.html (9,895 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]