Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Some\s+confusion\s+regarding\s+EZNEC\s+results\s+on\s+horizontal\s+loops\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Some\s+confusion\s+regarding\s+EZNEC\s+results\s+on\s+horizontal\s+loops\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Some confusion regarding EZNEC results on horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:14:09 -0500; Happy Holidays to all; I am using EZNEC v5, simulating a full wave horizontal loop on 160 meters, square shape, fed in the middle of one of the four sides, height is low to the ground (5 feet up). If; /archives//html/Topband/2010-12/msg00089.html (7,644 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Some confusion regarding EZNEC results on horizontal loops (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:46:37 -0600; The actual performance should be very close to that predicted when using the real ground. The reason you get a wrong answer using the Mininec ground is because you violated one of the rules for use o; /archives//html/Topband/2010-12/msg00099.html (8,643 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]