Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Slightly\s+OT\s+\-\s+amplifier\s+noise\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: n2icarrl@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:40:30 -0600
This discussion of Hi Z amplifiers has been quite interesting. Excellent information from W1FV and K7TJR. I have an RX amp question, related but slightly off-topic. I have an MFJ-1025/1026 noise canc
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00164.html (7,018 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:08:04 -1000
The J310 is as quiet as they come. It has a 100 MHz noise figure of (only) 1.5 dB. 73 and aloha, Dave KH6AQ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflect
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00165.html (8,749 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:12:59 -0400
Steve, The J310 is normally a pretty low noise device. Perhaps you should look at filtering the power supply and any control and feed cables. GL and 73, George, AA7JV I have an RX amp question, relat
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00166.html (8,743 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:20:42 -0400
Steve, Sorry, I did not directly answer you question. Look at the specs of the IF3602. (But also look at the price!) George AA7JV I have an RX amp question, related but slightly off-topic. I have an
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00167.html (8,715 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:46:33 -0700
Steve, Couple of questions to rule out gain distribution issues: 1) On the sense antenna input do you have the pre-amp turned on or off? 2) Is your sense antenna intrinsically inefficient like a beve
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00168.html (9,215 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: John Kaufmann via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:48:22 -0400
Steve, An alternative is to do the cancellation with all passive circuitry. You can find some designs on the Web but you'll have to build them yourself. An example (one that I built) is this one from
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00169.html (9,329 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:55:52 -0700
On 3/14/2020 10:20 AM, GEORGE WALLNER wrote: Steve, Sorry, I did not directly answer you question. Look at the specs of the IF3602. (But also look at the price!) George AA7JV JFET's have a channel re
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00170.html (8,639 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:54:29 -0700
Another pitfall that you have to be careful to avoid with the MFJ-1026 is making sure the level of the QRN you are trying null that is coming out of the sense antenna isn't much lower in amplitude th
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00171.html (10,785 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:57:06 -0500
Steve, I have an MFJ-1025, and I have never experienced your issues. I was going to ask some of these questions myself. I have had very good results indeed with mine for eliminating a single source o
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00172.html (9,872 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:59:40 -0500
Exactly! This is very important to get a deep noise null. Mike W0BTU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00173.html (11,699 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:36:16 -0700
Hi Mike, Yeah, when the off-air noise floor is a lot higher than the thermal noise floor from the JFET pre-amps, the imbalance I was alluding to wouldn't typically impact the overall noise floor sinc
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00174.html (11,939 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:51:09 -0700
The DXE NCC-1 and NCC-2 are well equipped to deal with this. I haven't measured noise, but I did carefully measure phase shift and gain for multiple settings. They're in http://k9yc.com/VE3DO.pdf 73,
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00175.html (9,102 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cuthbert <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:13:09 -1000
Steve, I ran a SPICE model of the MFJ-1095 front end. What gain there is resides there. The next three stages have unity gain. The input noise is: 1.8 MHz, 50 nV/Hz^0.5 7.0 MHz, 26 nV/Hz^0.5 14 MHz,
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00176.html (9,387 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:15:13 -0700
Dave is that -112 dBm you calculated the output referred noise? If so, what is the gain behind it? Thanks, 73, Mike W4EF....... 1.8 MHz, 50 nV/Hz^0.5 7.0 MHz, 26 nV/Hz^0.5 14 MHz, 19 nV/Hz^0.5 28 MHz
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00177.html (10,589 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:17:59 -0700
I am trying to understand what these noise cancelling schemes do that couldn't be done with a simple loop (rotating the loop until the noise drops into one of the null directions). You can easily pro
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00178.html (9,187 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:27:39 +1300
I used one of these systems (homebrew WA1ION) for a  couple of years in the early 2000s. My problem was a speed-controlled water pump (local water authority) very close to my QTH. The pump was in the
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00179.html (9,530 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:07:31 -0700
On 3/14/2020 3:17 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: I am trying to understand what these noise cancelling schemes do that couldn't be done with a simple loop (rotating the loop until the noise drop
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00180.html (9,274 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:34:56 -0700
Great explanation. Now I know what these canceling boxes are good for. I have a troublesome power pole about 100 ft off the corner of my property. I could put a sense antenna up in that corner and u
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00181.html (9,221 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 23:43:34 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Rick, A noise receiving antenna close to a noise source is used in conjunction with a higher performance receiving antenna such as a Beverage or an array of short verticals and a passive or active
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00182.html (10,104 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Ken Claerbout <kenk4zw@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 10:23:34 -0400
A couple of issues I see. It depends which direction(s) the noise and desired signal are coming from. You may null the noise and signal. Also, the loop is bi-directional. I've been playing with a DX
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00183.html (12,132 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu