Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Skin\s+Effect\s+of\s+RG\-6U\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Skin\s+Effect\s+of\s+RG\-6U\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Skin Effect of RG-6U (score: 1): Author: Dennis W0JX <w0jx@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:02:52 -0800 (PST); I have found that the quality, and therefore the loss, of RG-6 cable varies quite a bit. On the average, I measure about 14 ohms of resistance in 500 feet if shorted at the far end. Recently, I put u; /archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00168.html (7,152 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Skin Effect of RG-6U (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:31:11 -0800; Great advice. Also, stick to major mfrs like Belden and Commscope. See http://audiosystemsgroup.com/Coax-Stubs.pdf 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 Q; /archives//html/Topband/2011-02/msg00004.html (7,968 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Skin Effect of RG-6U (score: 1): Author: Dan Edward Dba East edwards <dan.n.edwards@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:37:39 -0800 (PST); oddly enough, I found some 'Direct TV High Definition' RG-6 that has a solid coppercenter conductor. it seems to behave better at low frequ's than the copper cladsteel. less loss and closer to 75 ohm; /archives//html/Topband/2011-02/msg00022.html (8,604 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]