- 1. Topband: Shuntfeeding (score: 1)
- Author: barrie@centric.net (Barrie Smith)
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 20:01:13 -0600
- Hello: I saved that issue for several years. Now that I'm somewhat in a position to attempt the task, I can't find the article. Can anyone provide me with a copy? I have an 18" face, 80' aluminum tow
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00088.html (7,716 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Shuntfeeding (score: 1)
- Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com)
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:07:25 -0700
- "Also, regarding radials: I've been told dozens of things about radials over the years. I won't quote them all here, but these are a few that concern me: The more the better?" -- Yes, of course. == "
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00093.html (7,945 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Shuntfeeding (score: 1)
- Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com)
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:53:37 -0700
- More on radials: Chapter 3 of the ARRL Antenna Book gives a good blurb on radial length versus number of radials, with a table showing the optimum radial length for various numbers of radials. Using
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00094.html (6,935 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Shuntfeeding (score: 1)
- Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 23:46:01 +0200
- over Yes, but beyond a certain limit the obtained improvement is totally neglectable. Not necessarily. The radials should be long enough to reach areas where the current is highest or still consider
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00095.html (8,337 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Shuntfeeding (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 20:20:44 -0400
- Actually .025 wavelength or so open-end spacing pretty much makes it look like a solid sheet of copper electrically. That falls reasonably well in line with three meters (it is actually four meters)
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00096.html (7,530 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu