Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Shunt\s+Feed\s+\-\s+Insulated\s+Elements\s+on\s+Yagi\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:43:06 -0600
I have never had an issue with this on any tower I have shunt fed that had a Yagi at the top with insulated elements, but then again my insulators are probably a lot better than the average ones used
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00287.html (7,162 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: john <jbattin@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:26:38 -0600
I once fed a tower with a klm 40m beam with an insulated DE on it with and the coax taped to the boom. The insulation on the coax broke down and the coax caught fire. I grounded the DE. Problem solve
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00292.html (8,082 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:05:16 -0600
Stan - For about 8 years, up until this past spring, my shunt fed tower for 160 had a KT34XA (insulated elements, later upgraded to a KT36XA same insulated elements) at the top and I never experience
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00294.html (9,534 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: k1fz@myfairpoint.net
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:33:25 -0500
One of the factors for arc over is the diameter of the tower and top support pipe diameter & length. A really FAT 1/4 wave tower may have 1000 ohms at the top, while a skinny tower would have much mo
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00295.html (8,922 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:39:19 -0400
Understanding what Bruce has posted would support the theory that a cage feed tower is indeed fatter with a lower impedance and thus less proclivity to arc over on the insulated elements. Herb Schoen
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00298.html (9,798 bytes)

6. Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Parker <ve7xf@dccnet.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:59:09 +0000
Good question, Stan. I've wondered the same thing. I have a 64' self-standing tower with a 3 el Steppir on it (insulated elements) and a 40m linear loaded dipole (also insulated) on top of that. I've
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00308.html (8,140 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:15:07 -0500
Concerning voltage breakdowns using yagi-loaded towers on 160 meters... I have heard stories of arcing to beat the band, that included a fair amount of destruction. I have heard stories of nothing ne
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00309.html (10,690 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:03:00 -0800
On Thu,12/18/2014 4:59 PM, Ralph Parker wrote: I have a 64' self-standing tower with a 3 el Steppir on it (insulated elements) and a 40m linear loaded dipole (also insulated) on top of that. I've wor
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00312.html (9,467 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Shunt Feed - Insulated Elements on Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:10:04 -0500
You can model this two ways: 1.) As a very high impedance load between the elements and the boom and look at the load data to see voltage between the boom and elements 2.) With a source between the e
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00345.html (10,457 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu