Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Short\s+Radials\s+\/\s+Antenna\s+Update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Short\s+Radials\s+\/\s+Antenna\s+Update\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Short Radials / Antenna Update (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:39:43 -0500; Good Day All, Results with the "...interim" 2-element 135-degree phased inverted "L" array here are DEFINITELY getting interesting...! I re-wired the rat's nest maze of wires that is the manual anten; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00185.html (8,891 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Short Radials / Antenna Update (score: 1): Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:09:57 -0800; Inverted-L antennas have a high angle component! So the close-in vs. far-out performance is as expected. The only way to get rid of the high angle component is to make the elements T-tops's (or some; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00187.html (7,280 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Short Radials / Antenna Update (score: 1): Author: "Raoul Coetzee" <raoulc@smmcape.co.za>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:23:53 +0200; yours truly, who might otherwise be that's perhaps beyond the "...usual fare", in the the absence of copper wire... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ If you see my 'poor' radial system in my backyard with abo; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00189.html (8,454 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Short Radials / Antenna Update (score: 1): Author: "donhall161" <donhall161@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:29:05 -0600; Raoul, Good luck on your radial system. I smile at the guys who will not get on Top Band because of too few radials. My DXCC on that band was done from an 80X123 foot lot in suburban Dallas using an; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00190.html (7,652 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]