Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Short\,\s+Fat\s+Vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Short\,\s+Fat\s+Vertical\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Short, Fat Vertical (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:08:41 EST; I'm pretty much restricted to a maximum height of 40' for any antenna I install on my covenant-restricted lot. I have thought about an inverted L, but I also wonder if I can achieve a greater effecti; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00184.html (7,809 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Short, Fat Vertical (score: 1): Author: Roy Morgan <roy.morgan@nist.gov>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:51:22 -0500; Paul, - A local ham friend reports his experience with a 160 meter inverted L: he got basically no results at all until he replaced the vertical #12 wire with some pieces of TV mast tubing, THEN it w; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00186.html (7,869 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Short, Fat Vertical (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:24:07 -0500; The tallest effective height occurs with uniform current over the vertical length. A really fat radiator has high distributed capacitance and tends to increase current taper, which is not what we wa; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00188.html (10,881 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Short, Fat Vertical (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:48:27 -0800; I've done a lot of modeling related to this issue and my conclusions are that (1) you want maximum radiation resistance to minimize ground loss (2) this is maximized by making the antenna tall and s; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00191.html (9,387 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Short, Fat Vertical (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:10:16 EST; I'm pretty much restricted to a maximum height of 40' for any antenna I install on my covenant-restricted lot. I have thought about an inverted L, but I also wonder if I can achieve a greater effecti; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00198.html (7,695 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]