Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Seasonal\s+Propagation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Seasonal\s+Propagation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Seasonal Propagation (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (K1ZM@aol.com); Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 02:25:04 EDT; Hi Gang Listening to how the band is developing so far this season, it seems from here in NY that there remains a **very** high level of absorption on 160m - especially on high latitude signals out o; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00106.html (7,393 bytes)
2. Topband: Seasonal Propagation (score: 1): Author: S21YP@granger.bdonline.com (Bob G3REP); Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 08:58:45 +0600; Hi all perhaps I am making a wrong assumption here but is the propagation to the northern hemisphere more favourable in Jan and feb rather than Nov Dec ?? I have the impression (perhaps misguided) th; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00026.html (7,216 bytes)
3. Topband: Seasonal Propagation (score: 1): Author: S21YP@granger.bdonline.com (Bob G3REP); Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 19:31:45 +0600; Hi all I am including all the replies I got to my original posting. In summary people have observed the difference in propagation but no one actually came up with a conclusive answer. Could it be a t; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00059.html (10,712 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]