Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Rules\s+vs\.\s+Ethics\s+$was\s+Brave\s+New\s+World$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Rules\s+vs\.\s+Ethics\s+$was\s+Brave\s+New\s+World$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:45:47 -0600; but it is fully sanctioned by the ARRL. Jim stated as much in the note to which you are replying. What is in play here is the difference between laws/rules and ethics. Just because something is "leg; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00691.html (8,193 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:02:43 -0700; I am still waiting for a real case scenario where remote radio has harmed or damaged someone, somehow........ You are confusing ethical and moral. There is nothing unethical either. It is condoned by; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00692.html (11,087 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 16:23:51 -0600; or damaged someone, somehow I guess that depends on how you define "harmed". If you are expecting manslaughter, I doubt you'll find an example of that. I cited an example of how this is not victimle; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00693.html (12,080 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:04:05 -0600; Good for you Larry to post this. It is interesting how some folks come up with all sorts of excuses to justify their unethical/immoral thoughts and behavior. The ARRL by fully putting the onus on the; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00702.html (9,675 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:49:20 -0800; Larry, you hit upon a very important point regarding ethical lapses not being entirely victimless. Personally, I feel very strongly that when I send a QSL to someone it should indicate the state, cou; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00732.html (12,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]