Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Reversebeacon\s+S\/N\s+interpretation\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Reversebeacon S/N interpretation (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:18:23 -0400
I felt conditions were really good to EU last night on 160M. But look at these S/N numbers below that came from reversebeacon. I know that due to measurement to measurement jitter that we have to rej
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00082.html (10,447 bytes)

2. Topband: Reversebeacon S/N interpretation (score: 1)
Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:51:58 -0400
Had a large front to back on my transmit phased verticals indicating low angle reception last night.  (Some times called spot-light propagation) Top band is alive and well !   73 Bruce-k1fz www.qsl.n
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00084.html (10,550 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Reversebeacon S/N interpretation (score: 1)
Author: GW8IZR <gw8izr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:48:45 +0100
All My apologies but due to an error 18 inches behind the keyboard the GW8IZR skimmer was closing the 160m RX an hour before local sunrise, tomorrow onward it will be an hour after 73 de Paul GW8IZR
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00088.html (11,756 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Reversebeacon S/N interpretation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:37:48 -0400
Thanks for the info, Tim. ON5KQ is one of our long-time RBN contributors, with something like the reference configuration (QS1R receiver, Skimmer Server 1.40.0.138, Aggregator 4.1). I wonder if maybe
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00092.html (12,170 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Reversebeacon S/N interpretation (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:05:03 -0400
Pete, I certainly understand that the skimmers can overestimate S/N based on applying a broadband noise model to what is really a nearby carrier. And my gut feeling is that 40-67dB S/N's on a NA to E
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00093.html (14,743 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Reversebeacon S/N interpretation (score: 1)
Author: Cormac Gebruers <ei4hq.mail@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 18:10:30 +0100
Greetings, I worked NO3M... OK, OK, NO3M worked me ;-) at 0537z on 2015/09/17. Given this discussion I thought I'd add my ha'penny's worth as grist to the "how in goodness name does topband actually
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00011.html (7,336 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu