Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Response\s+to\s+W8JI\'s\s+comments\s+about\s+using\s+a\s+K2AVfoldedcounterpoise\s+at\s+VK6VZ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Response\s+to\s+W8JI\'s\s+comments\s+about\s+using\s+a\s+K2AVfoldedcounterpoise\s+at\s+VK6VZ\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Response to W8JI's comments about using a K2AVfoldedcounterpoise at VK6VZ (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:13:23 -0400; I wonder.....Is there is a simple way to compare the field strength of an FCP with my current NON dense and uniform ground system, and draw reasonably accurate conclusions about efficiency improvemen; /archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00248.html (12,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]