Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Remotes\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: "Mel Crichton" <kj9c@iquest.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:36:28 -0500
For a number of reasons, I operate my regular Indiana QTH from here in Montana. Here we have CCRs that limit me to very low invisible stealth antennas and fewer bands, and being surrounded by mountai
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00721.html (7,646 bytes)

2. Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:57:26 -0800
This growing practice of hiring a remote in another call area far from your own QTH, then working wild and exotic DX wile preventing deserving locals operating from their home stations from working s
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00000.html (7,501 bytes)

3. Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:30:30 -0800
away is..'ok', yet using a simple remote RX, say 10- 100 miles away, while transmitting from your own backyard, is a 'no-no'. I can't hear worth beans from my own qth, yet 100 miles north of me, my d
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00001.html (8,672 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, PA5MW via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:38:01 +0100
Agree with you here Steve. Cannot understand why people would be enjoying, let alone peer bragging, about something which is NOT resembling their personal effort. It sure has its roots in decent pare
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00002.html (9,354 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:49:37 -0500
Steve, I thought that train left the station about 10 years ago. Remote stations DXing is well established. Is it really any different than someone that used to live in W6 and now lives in W1 that ha
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00003.html (6,706 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: David Raymond <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:11:05 -0600
We've seen the same thing the past few days with people using RHR to work the current 7O2WX operation.  Of course, I'm sure they will be claiming it for their DXCC, which at one time was the world's
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00004.html (10,617 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:29:00 -0800
On 2/5/2024 10:11 AM, David Raymond wrote: We've seen the same thing the past few days with people using RHR to work the current 7O2WX operation.  Of course, I'm sure they will be claiming it for the
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00005.html (9,209 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:39:44 -0500 (EST)
The art of working DX has been going downhill for years. I would not allow spotting. Mike N2MS _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00007.html (8,569 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:48:41 -0500
Hi Steve, The horse has left the barn.  I have lost a bit of enthusiasm ever since Maine became a hotspot for 160M into Europe a number of years ago.  There are so many "killer" remote stations in th
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00008.html (9,739 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Hans Hjelmström <sm6cvx@hjelmstrom.se>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 20:10:49 +0100
Well, Topband and 6 meters is killed by FT 8 anyway. Hams seems not to care,,,,there is not a single sound on qrg,BUT Hams seems to be happy to push a finger and let the computer make a so called qso
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00009.html (11,251 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 13:29:40 -0600
While the idea of using a remote to work challenging DX on 160 or other bands had never occurred to me prior to reading about it on these reflectors a few years ago, there is of course the simplest s
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00010.html (15,280 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Dennis Ashworth <dennis@ashworth.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 20:57:36 +0100
Hans you nailed it with your comment: No We all have to do it our own way and let the other do it their way,BUT dxcc is gone for ever as an important award. I dont even update my DXCC totals anymore
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00011.html (14,422 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:28:15 -0800
On 2/5/2024 8:57 AM, Steve Harrison wrote: This growing practice of hiring a remote in another call area far from your own QTH, then working wild and exotic DX wile preventing deserving locals operat
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00013.html (9,754 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 22:32:20 +0200
Hi This topic has been discussed several times already. ARRL pays no attention and continues its business. There is a saying "And Vasily (thats the cats name) listens and eats..." But there is always
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00014.html (10,039 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: dave nz3m.com <dave@nz3m.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:08:49 +0000
Ed, Thats a consequence, not intent. my 2c. I really don't care much but can see the issue. 73 Dave NZ3M ________________________________ From: Topband <topband-bounces+dave=nz3m.com@contesting.com>
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00015.html (8,761 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Steven Daniel <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:55:20 -0600
Unethical is an interesting term. In my profession, periodontics, ethics and ethical behavior is proscribed in our rules. Since dentistry, like the law and medicine are regulated on a state by state
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00016.html (11,403 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Jeff via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 19:28:45 -0600
Jeff Reynolds Hans Hjelmström wrote: Hams seems not to care,,,,there is not a single sound on qrg,BUT Hams seems to be happy to push a finger and let the computer make a so called qso for them. Lets
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00017.html (14,162 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Charles Morrison <charles.morrison.n1rr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 20:45:08 -0500
* If you want to "fix it", petition to change DXCC to read:* * "4-digit GRID SQUARE" -or- * * "Same State" -or- * *"Same Antenna for all contacts"* * -or- "wearing the same clothes as you wore for yo
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00018.html (9,216 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:07:43 -0800
"* I'm still stuck in the 1970's with my Drake line.*" Nothing wrong with that. :-) Tree N6TR _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00019.html (10,119 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Ken WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 23:19:38 -0500
Why is it important what someone else does? Doesn't our fulfillment come from what **we** do? I admit, I'm not a competitive person. I prefer to be amazed at what I can do with my own skills, includi
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00020.html (11,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu