Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Relocation\s+to\s+mountainous\s+area\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Relocation\s+to\s+mountainous\s+area\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Relocation to mountainous area (score: 1): Author: Mark Lunday <wd4elg@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 02:48:20 +0000; My current QTH in the Piedmont of Central NC, although not ideal for propagation, has some advantages. I have a 1.4 wave inverted L on 160 plus a HiZ four-square receiving array. These have served me; /archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00008.html (7,856 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Relocation to mountainous area (score: 1): Author: Bob Kupps via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 02:59:21 +0000 (UTC); Hi Mark Put down as many non resonant ground or elevated radials as you can. You can do nothing about the far field pseudo Brewster angle. The Hi Z manual states the recommended deviation in element; /archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00009.html (9,009 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Relocation to mountainous area (score: 1): Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 14:03:02 -0400; Hi Mark. I wonder where specifically you're relocating to. Three years ago I moved from Harnett County, NC, up here to Ashe county, near West Jefferson. The soil here is not at all what I expected; /archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00011.html (14,659 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Relocation to mountainous area (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 17:57:36 -0400; Central Vermont (my QTH) has just about the worst conductivity soil in the US. Glacial till on top of Granite. One of the US?s largest and oldest Granite mines is only 5 miles from my QTH and is visi; /archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00015.html (8,220 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]