Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receiver\s+problems\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receiver\s+problems\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Receiver problems. (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:24:51 EST; KC1SX: ..... snipped We know that radio that chokes with 9+30 (good "average" strong) signal few kHz away will also choke with signals that are spaced further away, depending on the design of radio's; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00134.html (10,392 bytes)
2. Topband: Receiver problems. (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:04:02 -0500; I'm sure you know what you are saying, but it came out wrong. The above usually isn't true. Many or most receivers today have much worse close-spacing than wide-spacing performance. I think what you; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00136.html (9,431 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]