Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+core\s+inductance\s+and\s+current\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+core\s+inductance\s+and\s+current\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: core inductance and current (score: 1): Author: Hermod Pedersen <hermod.pedersen@bolina.hsb.se>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:48:37 +0100; Charlie N0TT wrote: I have a remote switch that individually controls 6 relays through a ~1/4 mile long coax line that is used to switch receiving antennas. For RF chokes in this device I use 73 mix; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00133.html (7,637 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Re: core inductance and current (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:48:55 -0500; Many physically larger chokes (rather than miniature molded types) are OK for passing control currents. If the choke core does not saturate from bias current and the choke has enough Q (for low powe; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00139.html (8,273 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Re: core inductance and current (score: 1): Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 08:42:39 -0600; I use 220 uH RF chokes rated at 0.5 amp DC current, with no problems. They are solenoid-wound, single-layer on a ferrite core. I avoid larger values and higher current ratings -- they usually have tw; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00141.html (8,210 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]