- 1. Topband: Re: Topband digest, Vol 1 #497 - 16 msgs (score: 1)
- Author: g3lzq@john-dunnington.freeserve.co.uk (John Dunnington)
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:12:12 -0000
- Josef EA6ACC wrote ..! If someone uses cluster, and see a nice DX there, there are much more possibilities to get it than others without packet conection. Otherwise, if you have to find by yourself (
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00312.html (8,759 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Re: Topband digest, Vol 1 #497 - 16 msgs (score: 1)
- Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:46:50 -0500
- Those who don't have Beverage or EWE or K9AY or Pennant/Flag receiving antennas should try some of their other non-160 meter antennas for receiving. They sometimes provide signal-to-noise improvemen
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00313.html (8,343 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Re: Topband digest, Vol 1 #497 - 16 msgs (score: 1)
- Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin)
- Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 18:09:21 -0500
- Dear Topbanders, I agree with Jeff's comments. There are times I can hear best on a Cushcraft WARC dipole model D3W, broadside to the weak signal, although a beverage is usually better. It is tricky
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00318.html (7,337 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Re: Topband digest, Vol 1 #497 - 16 msgs (score: 1)
- Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist)
- Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 22:00:54 -0500
- I have found my 60 foot high 160 meter inverted vee a pretty good receive antenna; it always is better than the vertical and often is competitive with the beverages. I like to run dual receive on the
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00320.html (7,301 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu