Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Low\s+Rx\s+Dipole\s+on\s+Topband\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Low\s+Rx\s+Dipole\s+on\s+Topband\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: Low Rx Dipole on Topband (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 08:32:11 EDT; Hi Roger and All For many years I had a low 160M dipole here in NY (about 8 feet above ground) oriented so as to RX from the East/West headings. It was just "yet another" position on my Rx antenna sw; /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00022.html (6,961 bytes)
2. RE: Topband: Re: Low Rx Dipole on Topband (score: 1): Author: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:06:10 +0000; Someone on these pages said this week that you can never have TOO MANY Rx antennas for 160M - I would agree with that assessment. You just NEVER know what will work best when listening on Topband....; /archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00075.html (8,190 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]