Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Beverage\s+Length\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Beverage\s+Length\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 07:39:55 +0200; Nobody seems to talk about the wave angle of the beverage main lobe, at least I haven´t seen anything. Seems to me that anything much shorther then 4 wl doesn´t work. If you check Misek's; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00119.html (8,149 bytes)
2. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: john.devoldere@pandora.be (John Devoldere (ON4UN)); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:02:19 -0000; SM2EKM: Jim et all: I cover that quite extensively in my chapter on special receiving antennas, including Beverages... Haven't you noticed? 73 john, ON4UN -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00122.html (7,638 bytes)
3. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:14:37 -0400; Hi Jan, I don't follow that line of thought. Even a 1 WL Beverage has good response along the ground for groundwave, and at low wave angles for skywave. A 4 WL Beverage is about useless because the p; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00123.html (8,571 bytes)
4. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: r.c.eldridge@ieee.org (Bob Eldridge ); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:59:44 -0700; Can't let that go without comment! This is HF thinking, and Beverages are for 160 and 80, where low angle signals hardly exist unless you are on or close to the sea. Harold Beverage showed that 1w i; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00127.html (8,121 bytes)
5. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:55:30 +0200; VE7BS: Ok, so no low angle signals for DX on 160 and 80, correct? How far from the sea do you have to be to get low angle? If this is correct why don´t we use high angle radiators? I mean., if; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00128.html (8,117 bytes)
6. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: john_w1fv@telocity.com (John Kaufmann); Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:02:14 -0400; I have not seen much data on angle-of-arrival of DX signals on 160. However, over the past year I have had the opportunity to make many observations on angle-of-arrival on 80 with a rather unique ant; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00130.html (10,108 bytes)
7. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:51:27 -0400; Hi Jim I don't buy into that high angle stuff for a minute! I have many transmitting antennas including dipoles at 300 feet, and ground mounted verticals. The dipoles (at best) tie the ground mounted; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00131.html (8,841 bytes)
8. Topband: Re: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:49:28 +0100; I've seen this many, many times after sunrise. In the summer of 1985 I worked many VK's on SSB regularly around Colorado sunrise. In fact, many of those QSO's were with Bob VK3BVS who is now VK3ZL. H; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00133.html (8,843 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]