Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Band\s+reports\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+Band\s+reports\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: Band reports (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:15:37 EST; Would appreciate it if posters would indicate their receiving & transmitting antennae, and xmit power when posting messages such as this. Tnx & 73, Barry N1EU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00108.html (6,853 bytes)
2. Topband: Re: Band reports (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:10:09 EST; I'd like to suggest that QTH be identified too as many reports don't have it or a call. Even with a call from US hams this can be difficult for anyone to really know where the station is which of cou; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00111.html (6,789 bytes)
3. Topband: Re: Band reports (score: 1): Author: jon.zaimes@dol.net (Jon Zaimes); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 22:40:28 -0500; Good point Barry.... Best copy was on my 500-ft JA Beverage. At times JA1HQT was almost as loud on the 600-ft. West Beverage. I didn't try to listen on the TX antenna. Tx antenna is an inverted L wit; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00113.html (7,137 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]