Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+160\s+Meters\s+Mobile\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+160\s+Meters\s+Mobile\s+Antennas\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: 160 Meters Mobile Antennas (score: 1): Author: W9UCW at aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com); Date: Sun May 11 06:02:57 2003; Hi Les & Others, As my name and call have been dragged thru this thread several times, I feel like I'm a part of it. I'd like to comment. The main topic seems to be effectiveness or loss especially r; /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00079.html (11,244 bytes)
2. Topband: Re: 160 Meters Mobile Antennas (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun May 11 17:40:37 2003; rapidly true and I agree with most of what you say Barry, but I disagree with the above. Current in ANY *non-radiating* two-terminal device or component is exactly the same at each end, this include; /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00082.html (7,856 bytes)
3. Topband: Re: 160 Meters Mobile Antennas (score: 1): Author: w7iuv at arrl.net (Larry Molitor); Date: Sun May 11 17:40:51 2003; W9UCW's post brought back a lot of memories. I could write a book about topband mobile'ing around the south side of Chicago in the early 60's! Instead, I'll offer a few things I've learned in the las; /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00088.html (10,302 bytes)
4. Topband: Re: 160 Meters Mobile Antennas (score: 1): Author: k3ky at erols.com (David Sinclair); Date: Wed May 14 06:28:25 2003; (snip) (snip) This is most amusing, as the second coil being described sounds like it should be more lossy, and it sounds somewhat like one of those often-maligned Hustler resonators. The outer layer; /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00106.html (8,189 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]