Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radiation\s+from\s+Ends\s+of\s+Beverage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radiation\s+from\s+Ends\s+of\s+Beverage\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Radiation from ends of Beverage (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:59:56 -0500; This is kind of esoteric, so maybe someone can help double check my logic. There is a way to estimate sensitivity of the ends. Radiation resistance of short uniform current antennas is very easy to d; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00128.html (8,545 bytes)
2. Topband: Radiation from Ends of Beverage (score: 1): Author: "Sam Dellit" <sam.dellit@bigpond.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:02:29 +1000; g'day tom & the topband gang roll on 1 Jan 04 (aussie morse requirement voided)! re tom's post : my em theory is not as strong as i would like & i read far more than i absorb, but nevertheless some m; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00137.html (11,741 bytes)
3. Re:Topband: Radiation from Ends of Beverage (score: 1): Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:08:25 +0100; -- Initial Header -- To : "Tom Rauch" w8ji@contesting.com,"Topband Reflector" topband@contesting.com Cc : Date : Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:02:29 +1000 Subject : Topband: Radiation from Ends of Beverage Hi; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00139.html (8,345 bytes)
4. Re:Topband: Radiation from Ends of Beverage (score: 1): Author: "CHARLES HUTTON" <charlesh3@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:49:18 +0000; The good Doctor Beverage addressed this issue. To see what he thought, take a look at "The Classic Beverage Antenna Revisited" in the Jan. 82 QST. In a nutshell, he recommends heights no greater than; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00143.html (10,313 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]