Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radials\s+on\s+ground\s+v\s+FCP\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: CUTTER DAVID via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 15:27:28 +0000 (GMT)
Rob I recall a discussion on here some years ago which proposed that, whilst being an amazing antenna for top band, if you could achieve it, the broadcast model was not necessarily the best use of re
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00053.html (9,392 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 09:36:03 -0800
On 1/8/2022 7:27 AM, CUTTER DAVID via Topband wrote: I recall a discussion on here some years ago which proposed that, whilst being an amazing antenna for top band, if you could achieve it, the broad
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00055.html (9,456 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 12:14:26 -0600
I can't comment on the folded counterpoise because I am not familiar with it. The "broadcast model" which I take to mean 120 radials is used because in the case of a 90 degree tower on medium wave, t
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00056.html (9,627 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 14:25:15 -0700
I recall a discussion on here some years ago which proposed that, whilst being an amazing antenna for top band, if you could achieve it, the broadcast model was not necessarily the best use of resour
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00058.html (17,731 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:08:33 -0800
Hi Frank, It was definitely Cleveland. Got my abbreviations wrong after 60 years. :) Thanks, Jim Didn't Carl Smith run CIE (Cleveland Institute of Electronics) and not CREI (Capitol Radio Engineering
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00059.html (10,722 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: CUTTER DAVID via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 12:51:28 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Rob I see copper prices have doubled in the last year. https://k2av.com/Olinger_NCJ_article_on_FCP.pdf he says "The reason for the FCP is twofold: minimal space and a low-loss alternative to radia
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00061.html (12,317 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 08:22:15 -0800
I see copper prices have doubled in the last year. This is a false dichotomy between FCP and a broadcast station ground screen. The best use of wire is to have a small number of elevated tuned radial
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00062.html (9,501 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: CUTTER DAVID via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 17:09:17 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks, Rick. My particular circumstances limit me to a small triangle of ground in the corner of a field and the FCP suits that very well. It would be interesting to know how the FCP compares to som
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00063.html (11,211 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 09:09:42 -0800
electric fence wire works perfectly for elevated radials  Also consider N6BT's single spiral radial configuration as an alternative to FCP. Rick N6RK _________________ See: https://nextgenerationante
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00064.html (9,385 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: CUTTER DAVID via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 17:20:03 +0000 (GMT)
I took my inspiration for the one turn counterpoise idea from HF Antenna For All Locations page 155, Fig 11.9(m). David G3UNA _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00065.html (11,843 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Kenny Silverman <kenny.k2kw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:42:31 -0500
N6BTs ring is pretty flexible in its dimensions. It can be 3 or 4 sides (or anywhere in between) and can handle some variation in symmetry. Ive been having issues finding a solution to the high tree
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00066.html (6,955 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 11:24:24 -0800
Ive been having issues finding a solution to the high tree attenuation on my property and I had an inverted L with the ring and another inverted L 340 away with 60 x 100 radials. The model showed the
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00067.html (8,201 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:13:10 -0800
As usual, I agree with Rick. But I'd like to observe that an extensive study of loaded mobile whips published in two parts in QEX about ten years ago showed that inductive loading, especially at the
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00068.html (9,292 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:21:31 +0000
According to Roy Lewallens Eznec site there are no more expensive versions of his Eznec software. He is retiring and is leaving a last version for free download. Take a look at Eznec.com for details.
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00069.html (9,300 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:42:09 -0800
73, Jim K9YC I wasn't clear. I assumed that the vertical has top loading wires, and the base loading inductor is added to get resonance. According to W8JI, once you have enough top loading to get un
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00070.html (8,470 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu