Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radials\s+on\s+a\s+fence\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radials\s+on\s+a\s+fence\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Radials on a fence (score: 1): Author: Peter Dougherty <w2irt@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:17:14 -0500; Hi all, On two sides of my yard is a wooden fence about 6' high, 75' one way from the feed point of the antenna to a corner, and then another 80-90' at right angles to that across the back of the pro; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00134.html (7,008 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Radials on a fence (score: 1): Author: Peter Dougherty <w2irt@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:30:19 -0500; Yes, this will be pushing against an inverted L. What I should have mentioned is that I can only have a radial field in about a 90-110 degree arc (west through a little east of north, and maybe 1 or; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00139.html (7,999 bytes)
3. Topband: Radials on a fence (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 05:02:46 -0800 (PST); Pete, just put out whatever radials you can in whatever directions you can, and don't agonize over it... It will radiate and receive... If you want to eek a bit more performance, then add a groundscr; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00142.html (7,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]