Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radials\s+in\s+the\s+pond\.\.\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radials\s+in\s+the\s+pond\.\.\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: AA8R <AA8R@AOL.COM>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:33:47 -0400; I'm putting out 60 1/4 wave radials for my 160m Inverted L on the ground. 4-5 of those radials will end up in my pond with anywhere from 5-10 feet to 25 feet in the pond for those 4-5 radials. The po; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00240.html (6,612 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:28:56 -0400; I'm putting out 60 1/4 wave radials for my 160m Inverted L on the ground. 4-5 of those radials will end up in my pond with anywhere from 5-10 feet to 25 feet in the pond for those 4-5 radials. The po; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00244.html (8,825 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:19 -0400; Hi, Randy,, Based on my experience, I would add weights to the radials that will enter the pond and extend them as far into the water as possible. My very first 160 inverted L was supported by a tall; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00245.html (9,419 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:53:11 -0400; I have to agree with Tom. With 60 1/4 wave radials on the ground, you are going to have a pretty good ground anyway, and it won't matter much what you do with a few of them. In my case, the ground ro; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00247.html (9,172 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: w4buw@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:51:58 -0400 (EDT); HI, RANDY... TOM, W8JI, HAS GIVEN YOU SOME GOOD INPUTS. WHAT YOU DO WITH HALF A DOZEN OR SO OF THE RADIAL ENDS PROBABLY WON'T RESULT IN ANYTHING MEASURABLE. I THINK IT IS GREAT THAT YOU HAVE THE REAL; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00251.html (8,802 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: Tod <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:14:50 -0500; Party pooper ! 73, Tod, K0TO Sent from my iPad 4 _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00259.html (8,368 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:31:33 -0400; Well, my "submerged radials" worked well, years ago. Of course, it probably helped that the lake had been treated with copper sulfate for vegetation control! Charlie, K4OTV Party pooper ! 73, Tod, K0; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00260.html (9,064 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:12:06 -0500; Here's some material about that, as well as some links. www.w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00262.html (8,027 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]