Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radials\s+Again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Radials\s+Again\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:41:52 -0500; While searching the Topband archives for information on radials I came across a very interesting bit of information submitted in October 1996 by W1FV. This information references a paper by Brown, Le; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00013.html (7,800 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:39:07 -0400; Mike, With 1/4 wl radials somewhere around 50 is the point where a curve representing field strength flattens way out. There just is a point where all the earth currents move into the low loss radia; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00015.html (8,905 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:43:42 -0700; Because this question is a very good one, it is one that has been asked (and answered) over and over again. The best answer I've seen is in the latest ARRL Antenna Book chapter on Grounding, by Rudy; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00016.html (9,279 bytes)
4. Topband: Radials again (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:13:40 -0500; Thanks to all who responded to this inquiry. It appears that 64 is a good place to start given the limited space to put them. That will eat up most of that 2000 feet of wire. Then, on to a RX antenna; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00018.html (7,265 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:17:56 -0700; You got only part of the story. Elevated radials need to be a significant fraction of a quarter-wave above ground to be as effective as a much larger number of on-the-ground radials, and 10 ft is far; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00020.html (7,895 bytes)
6. Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 04:38:56 -0700 (PDT); RE elevated radials needing to be a significant fraction of lambda above ground: Suggest you read Les Moxon's book "HF Antennas for all locations" for a discussion of this... I tend to avoid the batt; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00022.html (7,367 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:49:38 -0400; Denny, Congratulations on that nice DX, but the religious fervor comes when people "feel good" without actually having any real meaningful or useful data. Skywave propagation, especially 160, is so; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00025.html (8,531 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "sebdesn" <sebdesn@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:55:35 -0600; I have not seen any comments about ground screens...I have been using a screen of chicken wire around the base of my antenna for several years...The only emperical data on said screen was an article; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00026.html (7,445 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Garry Shapiro" <garry@ni6t.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:28:41 -0700; "Congratulations on that nice DX, but the religious fervor comes when people "feel good" without actually having any real meaningful or useful data." IMHO, no supposed "expert" ever personified that; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00027.html (7,434 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:18:20 -0500; http://members.cox.net/w5uc/ I have not seen any comments about ground screens...I have been using a screen of chicken wire around the base of my antenna for several years...The only emperical data o; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00029.html (8,763 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 07:05:20 -0500; Gary et al, I essentially "...grew up" as a Ham reading & thoroughly enjoying poring over the late-great Lew McCoy's articles -- whether based upon cold, hard, calculated scientific facts, or not, hi; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00032.html (8,302 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: Robert Marshall-Read <rmread@starhub.net.sg>; Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:30:04 +0700; We miss something magical about Amateur Radio when we stop dreaming. Isn't that why we collectively got into this game in the first place...? End......... Yep Eddy, you got it in one try! I have deg; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00034.html (8,144 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Radials Again (score: 1): Author: gm4fam@tiscali.co.uk; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:32:52 +0000; Eddy (VE3CUI) is spot on - and what a feeling when those dreams come true! 73 de CRIS GM4FAM ___________________________________________________________ Don't miss the Autumn Ideal Home Show at Earls; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00040.html (7,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]