- 1. Topband: RG-6 Coax again (score: 1)
- Author: W5UN <w5un@wt.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:21:09 +0000
- I think I saw someone talk about using RG-6 75 ohm coax at a full KW and F connectors on 160, but I cannot remember if it was on this reflector. I have some "high Quality" RG-6 cable with the "right"
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00092.html (6,696 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: RG-6 Coax again (score: 1)
- Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:47:01 -0400
- That would have been me Dave. I have been using Garden Variety RG6 on my 160 array for well over 20 years. I tested a single run of it with a pair of heathkit dummy loads. Test piece of cable was 10
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00096.html (7,779 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: RG-6 Coax again (score: 1)
- Author: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
- I second that! I have been using the standard rg-6 ~$45/1000 ft box. I have run over 1kw on 40, 80, and 160 with no problems what so ever. I have been using the snap n seal style f connectors wit
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00098.html (9,317 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: RG-6 Coax again (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Smits <bob@rsmits.ca>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:40:50 -0700
- And how do you get it back down to 50 ohms for the transmitter. -- Robert Smits bob@rsmits.ca _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00144.html (7,673 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: RG-6 Coax again (score: 1)
- Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:31:02 -0400
- Part of the discombobbled nature of this RG6 discourse might have to do with a lack of detail on failure modes, dissipation, etc. With a long run, say 200 feet, running 1.5 K, and let's say dissipati
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00151.html (10,972 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu