Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RF\s+Issues\s+with\s+Heart\s+Pacemakers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RF\s+Issues\s+with\s+Heart\s+Pacemakers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RF Issues with Heart Pacemakers (score: 1): Author: George Taft via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 14:24:31 +0000 (UTC); A few years ago, my Cardiologist was recommending a pacemaker for my heart health. I was concerned over RF issues with my DX operating and polled the TB reflector for personal reports from those who; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00082.html (7,557 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: RF Issues with Heart Pacemakers (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 11:11:39 -0700; Hi George, Many years ago, I saw what I considered solid input that these devices are not sensitive to RF at frequencies we use. The laws of physics support that -- RFI is coupled either by by antenn; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00083.html (8,143 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: RF Issues with Heart Pacemakers (score: 1): Author: Bill Weaver <weaverwf@usermail.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 14:22:26 -0400; I worked in engineering for a pacemaker firm for 16 years. About a half dozen of the other engineers were hams too. I never heard of any issues with RF interference (and I surely would have being rig; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00084.html (7,923 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: RF Issues with Heart Pacemakers (score: 1): Author: Charles Otnott via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 15:06:22 -0500 (GMT-05:00); George, et.al., Several years ago I had an implant as part of a heart study. My first question to the cardiologist was "what about 2Kw SW & VHF-UHF transmitters?" His answer was "These newer devices; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00086.html (9,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]