Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+REVISIT\s+Small\s+Rx\s+Loop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+REVISIT\s+Small\s+Rx\s+Loop\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: REVISIT Small Rx Loop (score: 1): Author: "Jimmy" <nq4u@myway.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:46:59 -0500; All, I am having some problems getting a small 160 mtr. Rx Loop -- built from ARRL Antenna Handbook -- to resonate. The loop is made from 20 ft. of RG-59 with a 170-800 pf variable cap for tuning. Su; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00276.html (6,935 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: REVISIT Small Rx Loop (score: 1): Author: "Jimmy" <nq4u@myway.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:45:44 -0500; Thanks for the reply. Yep connected all as described below. Some further checking (and suggestions) seems to point in the direction of adding more capacitance. After the festivities are finished toda; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00280.html (9,132 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: REVISIT Small Rx Loop (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:16:52 -0800; See: http://www.n6rk.com/loopantennas/NCJ_loop_antenna_N6RK.pdf _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00281.html (8,093 bytes)
4. Topband: REVISIT Small Rx Loop (score: 1): Author: "David J. Sourdis - HK1A" <hk1kxa@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:33:20 -0500; I built the RX loop for 160 described on The ARRL Antenna Book, p. 5-24, 20th edition. The cap was adjusted for maximum RX level. One fellow ham suggested inserting a second variable capacitor in the; /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00285.html (8,775 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]