Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RE\:\s+PSK\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RE\:\s+PSK\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RE: PSK on 160 (score: 1): Author: "Dick McNutt" <dmcnutt3@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:46:43 -0400; There is really no difference in the relative number of poor PSK signals compared to SSB or Cw... witness the recent contests on 160...the important issue is that a PSK or any of the soundcard modes; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00239.html (7,012 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: RE: PSK on 160 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:50:32 -0400; <with no problems. I have tested up to 800 watts with some amateur/engineer <friends and the signal <was clean on the analyzer...and they were within 50 miles of my station. Respectfully Dick 99% of; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00243.html (7,965 bytes)
3. Topband: RE: PSK on 160 (score: 1): Author: "Dick McNutt" <dmcnutt3@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:45:21 -0400; Tom wrote: Respectfully Dick 99% of people with test gear can't measure more than 40dB down over the air, engineers or not. Even my newer test gear with all sorts of digital processing and signal sto; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00248.html (8,563 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: RE: PSK on 160 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:59:43 -0400; and you find examples of that 160 almost every day. I work a lot of PSK both on Mars and the Amateur bands and your statement that "all the PSK users whining constantly about people running more than; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00249.html (7,458 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]